bostonbubble.com Forum Index bostonbubble.com
Boston Bubble - Boston Real Estate Analysis
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SPONSORED LINKS

Advertise on Boston Bubble
Buyer brokers and motivated
sellers, reach potential buyers.
www.bostonbubble.com

YOUR AD HERE

 
Go to: Boston real estate bubble fact list with references
More Boston Bubble News...
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website and in the associated forums comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, expressed or implied. You assume all risk for your own use of the information provided as the accuracy of the information is in no way guaranteed. As always, cross check information that you would deem useful against multiple, reliable, independent resources. The opinions expressed belong to the individual authors and not necessarily to other parties.

A request for doom & gloom thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JAP
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 5:24 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's the point of a thread with this title? The same thing happens EVERY time one starts. The people who do not own, looking to buy a house, and are currently renting come on here and spew info/facts that support ONLY why the housing market will continue to decrease and not to buy.

The people who own, are in the process of buying, or have a direct vested interest in the RE market doing well (Realtors, mortgage brokers, etc) come on here and spew info/facts that support why housing will not go down much further if at all, give reasonings why you should buy now, and say why housing is still as great of an investment as it was pre bubble era. There are MANY less of these people here.

So IMO almost everyone's posts on here have a significant bias so to me it doesn't really give me much useful info. For the record I am in the process of purchasing a home but think it's still best to wait to buy to see what happens in late fall. Unless you can find a steal...
Back to top
Kaidran



Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 289

PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 5:38 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well this is bostonbubble.com so you might expect a majority of people to think that houses are overpriced. I think we are all agreed that predicting the future impossible. It is just interesting to hear what other people are thinking about the market and why.

I am curious what people think about Boston ITers opinion of tech jobs in Boston for the next few year, especially because that is all that is keeping me here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boston ITer



Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 5:55 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
What's the point of a thread with this title?


The point is to unearth the motivations, hidden or visible.

For me, the thinking/motivation is clear, white collar rust belt => future downward mobility => don't buy unless one can afford a local mortgage plus rent in a 2nd city for work (if we turn into Buffalo NY). The conclusion ... it's a dangerous proposition to get into housing, w/o either working for the govt or being a doctor in town. Caveat Emptor.

For others, their motivation is like this ... "I want to buy in Lexington or Lincoln so that my kids have a great shot of getting into Harvard/Yale Rolling Eyes " but then forget that everyone else in that h.s. is doing the same exact thing. Eventually, their kids get accepted into Carnegie-Mellon, rejected from Yale, waitlisted at Johns Hopkins and then, in the race for financial aid, Carnegie-Mellon dished them because they weren't number 1 or 2 in the class, and gave that free money to someone growing up in the woods out by Tolland MA who was Valedictorian and started his own radio show. The kids then attend Northeastern w/ a 50% scholarship.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kaidran



Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 289

PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 6:02 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess I'm with JAP then. It you knew everyones motivation to begin with why start the thread?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JCK



Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 6:07 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

renterstill wrote:

If you think of it, it really doesn't take much to tip the scale.


I think this was disproved by the march to $3 gas a couple of years ago. When oil was $40/bbl, the peaksters were saying the world would END if oil prices went to a $100/bbl (or whatever their favorite number was).

Well prices went to what, $140/bbl? The world did not end. People stopped buying SUVs. It just wasn't that big of a deal, unless you ran an airline. But frankly, we don't rely on air transport for our day-to-day lives. A bit less air travel does not equal the end of civilization.

So let's kill the idea that things are in such a delicate balance with cheap oil. There's no evidence to suggest that slightly higher energy prices are going to send our civilization (or our lifestyles) off the cliff. And certainly much evidence to suggest that people will make changes on an as-needed basis.

If we had to pay EU prices for gas, we'd be driving Geo Metros (or the like) instead of SUVs. More people would take the bus. Housing prices in places far from employment centers would fall. People would live in smaller houses. I really think that's about it. Look at Canada; their gas prices are quite a bit higher than here and the biggest difference is the size of vehicles people drive. (Lot more subcompacts; fewer SUVs).

Again, please explain to me why I should listen to the peak oil predictions, when the so-called experts on the subject are so consistently wrong.

The track record of the peak oil folks is horrendous. Absolutely awful. Until they admit their errors and learn from them, they are nothing more than a doomsday cult, wrapped in the shroud of pseudoscience.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boston ITer



Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 6:08 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, aren't you a bit curious about why only Balor and I seem to think that the non-health care white collar job market in this town is sloping downward?

Everyone else seems to be on the bandwagon of 'what goes down always comes back up'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JAP
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 7:35 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Boston ITer wrote:
Well, aren't you a bit curious about why only Balor and I seem to think that the non-health care white collar job market in this town is sloping downward?

Everyone else seems to be on the bandwagon of 'what goes down always comes back up'.


I haven't done enough research to comment on the nonhealthcare white collar jobs but I do know the white collar jobs in healthcare are increasing significantly. Go onto the job sites and search for jobs in healthcare in MA and look how many Director, VP, Manager level jobs are open and top companies searching for good people.

IMO this area will continue to thrive for top healthcare jobs/companies. Genzyme alone has probably 150-200 job vacancies for high paying salaried employees. New start up healthcare companies continue to come here but competition from San Fran, area in Fl and a few other places around the country are starting to heat up. As long as the overall job market for white collar high paying jobs hold stead RE prices will do the same with minimal ups and downs. This is one main reason Boston was much less effected by the bubble bust compared to DC, NY, Chicago, Detroit, etc.
Back to top
Kaidran



Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 289

PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 7:47 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am very curious about jobs in Boston, I just dont have any answers. My company (Biotech) seems to be doing very well but I dont like my chances of finding another if they started any layoffs.

JCK: people predicting PO have been wrong about dates, but not about discoveries. I think you are right that there is a huge amount of waste that we can eat into if capacity drops. I sincerely hope you are right about limited impact.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JCK



Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 8:19 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kaidran wrote:
I am very curious about jobs in Boston, I just dont have any answers. My company (Biotech) seems to be doing very well but I dont like my chances of finding another if they started any layoffs.

JCK: people predicting PO have been wrong about dates, but not about discoveries. I think you are right that there is a huge amount of waste that we can eat into if capacity drops. I sincerely hope you are right about limited impact.


This probably isn't the place to get into it, but the "discovery" data is basically forged to make things look worse than they really are.

The short answer is that peak oilers basically ignore reserve growth in existing fields. Typically a field is discovered, and assigned a value for the amount of recoverable oil. As the field is explored and drilled, this number goes up, often by a lot.

So even if you're not discovering new fields, there is still increasing amounts of recoverable oil each year.

Bottom line, is that the peak-oilers look at the reserve numbers for today, and assume they will not increase. But each year, the estimated reserves increase, even in existing fields, and the peak oilers are forced to move their prediction back by one more year.

Their assumptions can be construed as absolute worst case. Don't fall prey to the deceptive math and analysis.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenXer



Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 703

PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 12:27 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't take any predictions seriously. One can be optimistic, yet bet on housing prices to fall. If there is anything certain is that interest rates are going up, in a year or in 2 or in 5. They may be going up a little or a lot, depending on what's happening. The dynamic will be different howerver - it is very much possible to maintain a 10% unemployment for years, and inflation may be coming in terms of higher oil prices (and most likely not higher housing prices). However, again, too much push and pull and grey areas. Anything can set off another avalanche of a crisis. This is what I'm willing to put all my money on - we'll definitely have a crisis in the future. But again, buying a house in Tx with cash (or at least, putting up a good chunk of it in cash) will certainly beat anything one can buy in Boston when the interest rate rises. Savers will win on this one - higher rates certainly mean lower prices in Boston, and given that there is a very high chance that the rates will INCREASE, I'd say there is also a very high chance that the prices will fall in the future, or at least not rise (again, depending on where we look - I'm thinking Boston). Again, we don't know by how much, and it is also not a given that prices will necessarily fall when interest rates rise, but one can be sure that in areas where the prices are very high there will be much more pressure on prices to fall.

But to anybody buying a house in Boston right now this is almost a wash - just like a bond whose price falls when interest rises, buying a house thats 20% overpriced now with a low rate may mean the same thing as buying a house that's 20% lower in price but with a higher interest rate to compensate. However, as I said before, those who save and put down more than 20% will definitely have an advantage when interest rates rise. Thus, one way to play this real estate market is to wait and save - in the long run, not only will you win because you rent, but you'll definitely have the opportunity to buy a house when nobody else wants to buy because of high interest rates. Again, we don't know how much they'll rise, and when, but rise they will.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 1826
Location: Greater Boston

PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 2:07 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about the decline of the US dollar as the world's sole reserve currency? I think that would change a lot of things here, such as our ultra low interest rates, our ability to run massive federal deficits, and our bubble driven economy in general. Does anybody have any thoughts on how a shift away from the USD could be triggered and/or what system might replace it as the main reserve currency?

- admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
balor123



Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1204

PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 2:13 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Boston job market is very lopsided. If you are looking for Enterprise/B2B business, then you'll find plenty of them. If you are looking for semiconductor jobs, then you won't find them. Boston had a strong semiconductor presence 10 years ago but it's now all moved to Austin and Silicon Valley.

I have been passively job hunting for the last few months and it doesn't look good in either CS/EE. A lot of those startups are too squishy for an engineer to consider - lots of businessy people and maybe a few low skill low pay programmers. I don't know about Biotech but I hear it hasn't been doing well for a while. We've got some web startups like Seattle but at some point that will fissle like in the first web boom. It's hard to tell how many people are still working here because most of the companies just aren't hiring.

Aside from Adobe, I don't hear about big companies setting up large shops here anymore. As I discovered in another post, Boston does have a lot of VC but like I mentioned it isn't going everywhere. Looking at VC investments recently there's a few general categories that I see, which might be representative of where the jobs will be in the future: Biotech, squishy companies, web startups, and companies outside Boston. Surprisingly, I didn't run into as many MIT startups as I thought there were. Many of these are started by serial entrepreneurs left over from the 80s/90s boom and most of them will be retiring in the next few years, leaving just the recent grads to do the startups (a lost generation by a Boston VC). Surprisingly, for all that I read in MHT, there weren't many alternative energy / smart grid companies either. Anyway, I don't think those companies generate many jobs, despite being heavy on investment.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Boston ITer



Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 4:54 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
If you are looking for Enterprise/B2B business, then you'll find plenty of them.


&

Quote:
squishy for an engineer to consider - lots of businessy people and maybe a few low skill low pay programmers


are nice corollaries.

In effect, these businesses are looking to merge, right from the get-go. Their main growth strategy is to link with an offshoring partner, perhaps a cheaper version of Wipro, and then to continue to schmooze to whole value chain enterprise model to gain either market share or exposure. A majority of the tech positions here are a type of QA lead or data collection analyst. Really, having an MBA (with connections) in marketing is the key to success in these types of firms long term. It's ripe for being moved south as soon as a few deals are made since running a small data center is cheaper in Raleigh than here. That's part of the reason why I'm not impressed with the Boston area anymore; it's like *startup* but no sustainable model of an industry, aside from Biotech which is already mature.

The Adobe building is a recent exception to the rule.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kaidran



Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 289

PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 5:14 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

With new Biotechs I think the feeling is you succeed by getting bought. I don't think many start ups believe they will reach a public offering and none would actually become a viable company anymore. You can cash out by being one of the few people that started it but you are probably going to be looking for a new job soon after you have explained your technology to the purchasing company.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boston ITer



Joined: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 269

PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 5:27 pm GMT    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
With new Biotechs I think the feeling is you succeed by getting bought.


Which is somewhat different from let's say the mainstays, like Wyeth, Biogen, & Genzyme, where many people have actually built their careers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    bostonbubble.com Forum Index -> Greater Boston Real Estate & Beyond All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum posts are owned by the original posters.
Forum boards are Copyright 2005 - present, bostonbubble.com.
Privacy policy in effect.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group